The Wealthy

A common problem for Architects dealing with residential projects. Ahh to bite the hand that feeds…

 

MONEY

 

 

Most that use Architectural services in a Residential capacity have money. Usually a lot of it. Hence being able to afford the 8-12% (sometimes more) premium applied to the project. Because of this, there is a tendency to “lean on” the design. It is hard to do your job when you are being leant on. It gives you a bitter taste in your mouth. 

 

STYLE

 

 

The wealthy tend to be “stylistically” challenged. Style to them is a derivative of a trend in a magazine, or many clippings from magazines. Armed with subscriptions, these people seek a fusion Victorian, Classical, Romantic, English Garden, Modernist, Contemporary and whatever else they can find or have been told about. The Architect’s job is not to fuse, but to create a well thought out solution to a situation. What was that Architect’s fee going towards again? 

 

LITIGIOUS

 


The Wealthy tend to be litigious. Threats of legal action toward the Builder make for a hard job when you are stuck as the Administrator of a contract that in most situations one party doesn’t fully understand.

 

GOLD TRIM

 

 

The Wealthy tend to look for the “gold trim”. The extra that the others don’t have. It may be a cantilever, it may be a shingled roof, it might actually be golden trim. Its amazing how important that first party can be. Be thorough with the snag list.

 

A lesson to learn from all this? Be careful, residential projects will always span a minimum of 3 years. 3 years can be a long time, depending on how old you are.

 

DISCLAIMER**  In no way does this post relate to any of the fantastic clients I’ve worked for in the past. Its been a pleasure. 

4 Responses to “The Wealthy”

  1. Hahhahahah getting very cynical in your old age

  2. Mr Weezy you generalise unfairly. True - the wealthy’ (a vulgar term and a reference to ‘new’ money) rely on trend and latte gossip for inspiration….. but the rich (’old’ money with a pedigree) can be astute, keen, daring and deliciously extravagant. What fun!

  3. You’re right “me too”. It’s a habit I have. The tendency to lock onto the most unsavory element and generalise. Kind of the way people say all female pop singers are drugged up young dolls with too much money when there is a larger majority that are immensely talented, bright and contribute immensely to their field. I’m new to this, and will endeavour to be more thorough in the future.

    A counter-argument to support the drift.

    P.s. I love the “latte gossip” inspiration. Without a background in Architecture and design, would we all do it?

  4. mister weezy. if none of this refers to any of your clients then where is your perspective on this coming from? what experience do you have to call on if you’re not calling on your own? and why do you think you can comment on it if its not your experience?

Discussion Area - Leave a Comment